In order to manage the logistics of the first indoor opening ceremonies, Vancouver needed two Olympic cauldrons. The first cauldron was used during the official ceremonies inside BC Place, while the second (permanent) cauldron sits on Vancouver’s waterfront. Due to a now infamous hydraulics malfunction during the opening ceremonies, only three of the four ‘arms’ that surround the temporary cauldron were raised into position. Unfortunately, this undermined what seems to be the core logic of the design: allowing the cauldron to be lit by four torchbearers at once. Too bad, it’s a lovely sentiment and probably the most compelling aspect of the design. Free of technical glitches, the waterfront cauldron seems to be a big hit with Olympic spectators, though it’s far from perfection. Certainly, the scale of the design is suitably impressive and the five flame concept unique, but the resulting form is clumsy and feels out of step with the look of these Games. Up close, the details seem unconsidered and the textured metal work looks cheap – like a tin foil covered set from a low budget sci-fi movie (given Vancouver’s lively film industry, don’t be surprised if it ends up as exactly that). Compounding the shortcomings of the design itself, VANOC neglected the cauldrons role as a major tourist attraction and photo op. In order to maintain security around the cauldron and nearby media centre, the Vancouver Organizers surrounded the entire site with a chain link fence, effectively preventing (non VIP) visitors from getting a picture with the Flame. Flooded with complaints, last night VANOC finally responded by moving the fence closer, creating an opening for photos and providing an elevated platform for a better view. But the fence remains.

Comments

JustinFebruary 17, 2010
I agree completely: this is probably a design that looked good on paper, but translated poorly in the actual build. It almost looks like an industrial accident at a petrochemical plant: with three flame stacks that have fallen over.
Pez PengellyFebruary 18, 2010
I agree as well. I feel the Olympic cauldron in Whistler at the medals ceremony plaza is much more in line with the look of Vancouver 2010. Ours is a simpler design with a more fluid appearance which mirrors the Olympic torch and the rest of the visual feel of the games. Here’s an image of the [Whistler Olympic Cauldron](http://www.flickr.com/photos/pengelly/4367517344/).
Annie ElliottFebruary 19, 2010
I was wondering if the design of the Cauldron was inspired by the Totems discovered in 1987 on Ninstint (Queen Charlotte Islands) . Some of the Totems are now located in the Museum of Anthropology of UBC. Just a thought..
gdFebruary 19, 2010
This was designed by David Atkins Enterprises (who did the opening ceremonies) not VANOC. we had nothing to do with this project as it was top secret until the very end.
gdFebruary 19, 2010
Pez Pengelly – re: Whistler Olympic cauldron we (VANOC brand & creative) did that one, hence it feeling more aligned with the rest of our 3D pieces.
the pikerFebruary 20, 2010
Why can’t people simply be excited about an innovative design of 2010 Olympic games cauldron that looks spectacular, without always being critical and negative. You kind of people are such “downers” in life….take a happy pill!
margy smithFebruary 20, 2010
Come on. This design looks like some boys grabbed some duckwork out of a building and crudely lashed it together. Would not have placed high in high school science fair. Would have kept it behind the fence. You have a beautiful city with great natural beauty and design. This is hard to explain.
Michael ErdmannFebruary 21, 2010
Thanks GD, I’ve changed the credit based on your comments (always good to have the inside info). For the record, the official press release from VANOC takes full credit for the design and fabrication of the cauldron – – <http://rsrce.ca/n/38>
ronMarch 1, 2010
looks like something from Carl Mertens…
PattyMarch 1, 2010
Watching all the events from our large screen tv in the North Georgia USA Mountains, this Cauldron looked Awesome. Everyone here loves it!
PeggyMarch 1, 2010
I would sincerely like to know what the cauldron actually represents by the four pillars etc. Does it sympolize something Canadian? By the way it is lovely.
Lillian GrantMarch 3, 2010
Does anyone know who designed the Whistler cauldron? I had no problem finding out about the Vancouver one but the WHistler one is more elusive…i guessed maybe Bonbardier as it was closer to the torch design but no call back from them yet…..anyone have any ideas? I have calls into Vanoc and the the RMOW but no calls back yet….help! thx
MikeMarch 23, 2010
I thought the idea is that the pillars form a maple leaf, no?
IolaMarch 18, 2011
As a Canadian who loves the outdoors, particularly ‘back country’, can’t be feel it represents a campfire – especially in middle of B.C. Place surrounded by that massive audience. A campfire is a must, providing it’s not fire season when friends/family get together on a starlit evening, any season – at a lake in summer with gentle lap of waves on shore; in winter on an icy pond after some iceskating; or lunch while on a skinny ski back country jaunt. Also, the four leaning pillars represent the participation of the four First Nations groups, while the center flame is us, the “immigrants” from all corners of Planet Earth.
Privacy
Terms of Use
API
Problem with an entry?